Search for: "Bounds v. Social Security Administration Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm
Commissioner of Social Security makes clear that the ultimate decision on the issue of Disability belongs to the ALJ. [read post]
28 May 2017, 6:40 pm
As before, the Social Security Administration will continue not to be bound by the other agencies decisions. [read post]
28 May 2017, 6:40 pm
As before, the Social Security Administration will continue not to be bound by the other agencies decisions. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:53 am
Astrue, the District Court for the Middle District of Florida reviews a battle of medical opinions, explaining that the ultimate decision as to whether a claimant is disabled for Social Security benefits purposes is for the Social Security Administration (SSA), not a medical expert, to decide. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, along with its other much-anticipated decisions, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
In October 2018, the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) asked us to revise Rule 202.5(c) to read as follows: The Commission has adopted the policy that in any civil lawsuit brought by it or in any administrative proceeding of an accusatory nature pending before it, a defendant or respondent may consent to a judgment or order in which he admits, denies, or states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings.[7] I agree with the petitioner that… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
The following summary is taken from the Supreme Court site’s Press Release, with my comment below: This appeal concerns the question whether, in cases of social security benefit awards mistakenly inflated due to a calculation error, the Secretary of State is entitled to recover sums overpaid under the common law of unjust enrichment or whether section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (the “1992 Act”) provides the only… [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Its purpose is to "monitor, investigate, and submit to congress an annual report on the national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic relationship between the United States and the People’s Republic of China, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm
In Schrems v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 6:30 am
Ratliff filed suit against the Social Security Commissioner to recover the fees, arguing that fees awarded under Section 2412(d) belonged to her rather than Ree. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
As FCC Commissioners, we are deeply concerned that Big Tech’s expansive position threatens free speech and is inconsistent with the nation’s communications regulatory framework. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:47 pm
Pix Credit here Over the course of the last decade, and at least among the self-styled vanguard forces (both within the administrative apparatus of public institutions, in NGOs, and academia) it has become something of an immutable principle that state are expected to behave badly, but enterprises can be compelled to behave better. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:03 pm
Michael Weiner unpacks the new, amended complaint in FTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
In Ontario (Public Safety and Security) v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:03 pm
Cochran v. [read post]
